DeFiStar.io

Real-time Stablecoin Yields Tracker

GAS-ADJUSTED RETURNS CALCULATOR

Real Profitability After Transaction Costs • Break-Even Analysis • Net APY Across Chains

Last Updated: 23 Jan 2026, 15:00 UTC | 49 Pools Analysed

Pools Analysed
49
Excellent Efficiency
12
Avg Gas Impact
41.8%
Chains Compared
8

Why Gas Costs Matter

Headline APY figures don't tell the complete story of DeFi profitability. Transaction costs—the "gas fees" required to deposit and withdraw funds—can dramatically erode returns, particularly for smaller capital amounts and shorter hold periods. A pool advertising 10% APY might deliver just 7% net returns after gas costs, or even negative returns if the capital amount is too small.

This Gas-Adjusted Returns Calculator transforms nominal yields into real, take-home profitability by factoring in blockchain transaction costs. Our analysis reveals critical insights: (1) Layer 2 networks offer 95%+ gas savings vs Ethereum mainnet, making them optimal for smaller amounts, (2) Break-even capital thresholds vary dramatically by chain—what's profitable on Base may be unprofitable on Ethereum, (3) Hold period matters enormously—gas costs represent fixed expenses that dilute over longer timeframes.

Key Finding
Our data reveals that for $1,000 capital held 30 days, gas costs consume an average of 18.3% of gross yield on Ethereum mainnet but just 1.7% on Layer 2 networks. This 10x difference fundamentally changes which yields are actually profitable for retail investors. Pools that appear attractive on mainnet become excellent opportunities when accessed via L2.

Cross-Chain Gas Efficiency Analysis

Transaction costs vary by orders of magnitude across blockchain networks. Understanding these differences is essential for capital allocation decisions, particularly for amounts under $25,000 where gas costs represent material percentage of returns.

Gnosis

1 pools tracked
$0.15
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 0.37%
Efficiency Rating: EXCELLENT

Polygon

5 pools tracked
$0.50
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 1.24%
Efficiency Rating: EXCELLENT

BNB Chain

3 pools tracked
$0.60
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 1.48%
Efficiency Rating: EXCELLENT

Base

5 pools tracked
$0.80
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 2.88%
Efficiency Rating: GOOD

Arbitrum

7 pools tracked
$1.00
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 3.02%
Efficiency Rating: GOOD

Optimism

6 pools tracked
$1.50
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 4.43%
Efficiency Rating: GOOD

Avalanche

3 pools tracked
$1.50
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 5.13%
Efficiency Rating: MODERATE

Ethereum

19 pools tracked
$35.00
Typical Gas Cost
Avg Impact ($10k, 90d): 103.06%
Efficiency Rating: MODERATE
Layer 2 Advantage
Base and Gnosis demonstrate the lowest average gas impact (<1%), making them optimal for smaller capital allocations and frequent rebalancing strategies. Ethereum mainnet remains viable for larger amounts (>$50k) where gas represents <2% of total capital, or for very long hold periods (12+ months) where costs amortise over time.

Best Net APY After Gas Costs

Rankings based on net APY for $10,000 capital held 90 days. This represents a typical retail DeFi allocation and medium-term hold period, providing realistic profitability assessment.

Pool Protocol / Chain Gross APY Gas Cost Net APY Gas Impact Efficiency
GHO Aave V3 Arbitrum 13.60% $2.00 13.52% 0.6%
EXCELLENT
FDUSD Aave V3 BNB Chain 5.42% $1.20 5.37% 0.9%
EXCELLENT
GHO Aave V3 Avalanche 3.94% $3.00 3.82% 3.1%
GOOD
USDC Aave V3 Avalanche 3.94% $3.00 3.82% 3.1%
GOOD
DAI Aave V3 Polygon 3.54% $1.00 3.50% 1.1%
EXCELLENT
USDC Compound V3 Base 3.45% $1.60 3.39% 1.9%
EXCELLENT
GHO Aave V3 Base 3.43% $1.60 3.37% 1.9%
EXCELLENT
GHO Aave V3 Gnosis 3.33% $0.30 3.32% 0.4%
EXCELLENT
USDC Compound V3 Polygon 3.33% $1.00 3.29% 1.2%
EXCELLENT
USDT Compound V3 Polygon 3.30% $1.00 3.26% 1.2%
EXCELLENT
USDC Aave V3 Base 3.24% $1.60 3.18% 2.0%
GOOD
sDAI Maker sDAI Ethereum 6.00% $70.00 3.16% 47.3%
POOR
DAI Maker DSR Ethereum 6.00% $70.00 3.16% 47.3%
POOR
USDC Aave V3 Optimism 3.28% $3.00 3.16% 3.7%
GOOD
USDT Aave V3 Optimism 3.23% $3.00 3.11% 3.8%
GOOD
DAI Aave V3 Optimism 3.19% $3.00 3.07% 3.8%
GOOD
USDC Aave V3 Polygon 3.09% $1.00 3.05% 1.3%
EXCELLENT
USDC Aave V3 Polygon 3.09% $1.00 3.05% 1.3%
EXCELLENT
USDC Compound V3 Optimism 3.17% $3.00 3.05% 3.8%
GOOD
USDT Compound V3 Optimism 3.15% $3.00 3.03% 3.9%
GOOD
USDT Compound V3 Arbitrum 2.86% $2.00 2.78% 2.8%
GOOD
USDC Aave V3 Arbitrum 2.85% $2.00 2.77% 2.8%
GOOD
USDC Aave V3 BNB Chain 2.76% $1.20 2.71% 1.8%
EXCELLENT
USDT Aave V3 BNB Chain 2.74% $1.20 2.69% 1.8%
EXCELLENT
USDC Compound V3 Arbitrum 2.25% $2.00 2.17% 3.6%
GOOD
USDC Aave V3 Arbitrum 2.18% $2.00 2.10% 3.7%
GOOD
LUSD Aave V3 Arbitrum 2.16% $2.00 2.08% 3.8%
GOOD
DAI Aave V3 Arbitrum 2.15% $2.00 2.07% 3.8%
GOOD
USDbC Aave V3 Base 2.01% $1.60 1.95% 3.2%
GOOD
USDC Aave V3 Optimism 1.60% $3.00 1.48% 7.6%
MODERATE
EURC Aave V3 Avalanche 1.32% $3.00 1.20% 9.2%
MODERATE
EURC Aave V3 Base 1.20% $1.60 1.14% 5.4%
MODERATE
FRAX Aave V3 Ethereum 3.94% $70.00 1.10% 72.1%
POOR
USDC Compound V3 Ethereum 3.82% $70.00 0.98% 74.3%
POOR
USDC Aave V3 Ethereum 3.74% $70.00 0.90% 75.9%
POOR
USDT Spark Ethereum 3.65% $70.00 0.81% 77.8%
POOR
USDT Compound V3 Ethereum 3.43% $70.00 0.59% 82.8%
POOR
USDT Aave V3 Ethereum 3.34% $70.00 0.50% 85.0%
POOR
EURC Aave V3 Ethereum 3.30% $70.00 0.46% 86.0%
POOR
DAI Spark Ethereum 3.17% $70.00 0.33% 89.6%
POOR
USDS Spark Ethereum 3.04% $70.00 0.20% 93.4%
POOR
crvUSD Aave V3 Ethereum 2.89% $70.00 0.05% 98.2%
POOR
USDC Spark Ethereum 2.77% $70.00 -0.07% 102.5%
POOR
DAI Aave V3 Ethereum 2.26% $70.00 -0.58% 125.6%
POOR
PYUSD Aave V3 Ethereum 2.25% $70.00 -0.59% 126.2%
POOR
PYUSD Spark Ethereum 2.00% $70.00 -0.84% 141.9%
POOR
LUSD Aave V3 Ethereum 1.99% $70.00 -0.85% 142.7%
POOR
USDe Aave V3 Ethereum 1.88% $70.00 -0.96% 151.0%
POOR
RLUSD Aave V3 Ethereum 1.19% $70.00 -1.65% 238.6%
POOR

Break-Even Capital Requirements

Minimum capital amounts required to achieve <5% gas impact on returns across different hold periods. These thresholds represent practical profitability boundaries—amounts below break-even may not justify gas costs.

Pool Chain APY 30-Day Break-Even 90-Day Break-Even 180-Day Break-Even 365-Day Break-Even
GHO Arbitrum 13.60% $5,000 $5,000 $1,000 $1,000
FDUSD BNB Chain 5.42% $10,000 $5,000 $1,000 $1,000
GHO Avalanche 3.94% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDC Avalanche 3.94% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
DAI Polygon 3.54% $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDC Base 3.45% $25,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
GHO Base 3.43% $25,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
GHO Gnosis 3.33% $5,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
USDC Polygon 3.33% $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDT Polygon 3.30% $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDC Base 3.24% $25,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
sDAI Ethereum 6.00% $>100k $100,000 $50,000 $25,000
DAI Ethereum 6.00% $>100k $100,000 $50,000 $25,000
USDC Optimism 3.28% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDT Optimism 3.23% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
DAI Optimism 3.19% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDC Polygon 3.09% $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDC Polygon 3.09% $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDC Optimism 3.17% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDT Optimism 3.15% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDT Arbitrum 2.86% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDC Arbitrum 2.85% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDC BNB Chain 2.76% $25,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDT BNB Chain 2.74% $25,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000
USDC Arbitrum 2.25% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDC Arbitrum 2.18% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
LUSD Arbitrum 2.16% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
DAI Arbitrum 2.15% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDbC Base 2.01% $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
USDC Optimism 1.60% $50,000 $25,000 $10,000 $5,000
Break-Even Interpretation
Break-even thresholds decrease dramatically with longer hold periods. A pool requiring $10,000 for 30-day profitability might need just $2,500 for 365-day holds. This illustrates the fixed-cost nature of gas—spreading those costs over more days makes smaller amounts viable. Strategy implication: If capital is limited, either choose L2 networks or commit to longer hold periods to achieve profitability.

Calculation Methodology

Gas-adjusted return calculations employ realistic transaction cost assumptions based on historical blockchain data and current network conditions. Our model accounts for both deposit and withdrawal transactions, as profitability requires completing the full cycle of capital deployment and retrieval.

Gas Cost Assumptions

Net APY Formula

Gross Yield = Capital × (APY / 100) × (Days / 365)
Net Yield = Gross Yield – (Gas Cost × 2)
Net APY = (Net Yield / Capital) × (365 / Days) × 100

Break-even analysis solves for minimum capital where Net APY ≥ 95% of Gross APY (i.e., gas impact ≤5%).

Efficiency Ratings

Gas-Optimised DeFi Strategies

1. Capital Allocation by Amount
<$5k: Exclusively use Layer 2 networks (Base, Arbitrum, Optimism). Ethereum mainnet gas costs will consume 10-30% of returns.
$5k-$25k: Layer 2 preferred, but Ethereum viable for 6+ month holds or yields >8% APY.
$25k-$100k: All chains economically viable. Focus on best yields regardless of network.
>$100k: Gas costs <1% impact across all chains and timeframes. Network choice driven by security/protocol preferences rather than costs.
2. Rebalancing Frequency Trade-Offs
Every rebalance incurs gas costs for withdrawal from old pool and deposit to new pool. Rule of thumb: Only rebalance when yield difference × capital × remaining days > gas costs. For $10k capital on Ethereum, this means yield difference must exceed 0.5% APY to justify monthly rebalancing, or 2% APY for weekly rebalancing. L2 networks reduce these thresholds by 90%+.
3. Hold Period Optimisation
Fixed gas costs amortise over longer holds. If your capital amount appears below break-even for 30-day holds, check 90-day and 365-day thresholds. You may achieve profitability by committing to longer hold periods rather than increasing capital. This strategy works best for stable, high-persistence yields (see Yield Persistence Tracker) where you can confidently hold without active management.
4. Multi-Chain Portfolio Construction
Use chain selection as portfolio diversification tool: Large, stable amounts (>$50k) → Ethereum for security/depth, Medium amounts ($10-50k) → Mix of Ethereum + Layer 2 for balance, Active trading capital (<$10k) → Exclusively Layer 2 to preserve capital through frequent rebalancing. This approach maximises net returns whilst maintaining prudent diversification.

Real-World Profitability Examples

✅ Example 1: Small Amount, Layer 2
Scenario: $3,000 USDC @ 6% APY on Base, 90-day hold
Gross Yield: $3,000 × 0.06 × (90/365) = $44.38
Gas Costs: $0.80 × 2 = $1.60
Net Yield: $44.38 – $1.60 = $42.78
Net APY: 5.88% (gas impact: 3.6%)
Verdict: PROFITABLE – Layer 2 efficiency enables profitability even for modest amounts.
❌ Example 2: Small Amount, Ethereum
Scenario: $3,000 USDC @ 6% APY on Ethereum, 90-day hold
Gross Yield: $3,000 × 0.06 × (90/365) = $44.38
Gas Costs: $35 × 2 = $70.00
Net Yield: $44.38 – $70.00 = –$25.62
Net APY: –3.55% (gas impact: 157.7%)
Verdict: UNPROFITABLE – Gas costs exceed returns. Needs $15k+ capital or 12+ month hold for profitability.
✅ Example 3: Medium Amount, Long Hold
Scenario: $15,000 USDC @ 5% APY on Ethereum, 365-day hold
Gross Yield: $15,000 × 0.05 × (365/365) = $750.00
Gas Costs: $35 × 2 = $70.00
Net Yield: $750.00 – $70.00 = $680.00
Net APY: 4.53% (gas impact: 9.3%)
Verdict: VIABLE – Longer hold period amortises gas costs despite medium capital amount.
Data Analytics by MooniTooki ID VERIFIED
Passed Govt ID & Sanctions Screening Note: USBC app required to view Profile/Badge Chief Data Architect and Founder at DeFiStar.io Follow on X | Medium | Paragraph | Buy me a coffee
DeFiStar.io Analytics Engine
HOURLY SYNC: ACTIVE
Status: NODE_VERIFIED . Environment integrity confirmed for the 15:00 UTC hourly window. Last data fetch: 15:00 UTC. MooniTooki’s identity is Verified via the GlobaliD network. To view secure profile data and verification badges, the USBC mobile app is required.
Sync Tolerance: <60s Drift Verified | Sampling: 24/24 Snapshot Density | Auth Tag: DFS-260123-1500-d139 | Precision: Institutional (Hourly)
Support DeFiStar.io via Citation
Source: DeFiStar.io (2026). "DeFi Yield Analytics". Analytics by MooniTooki. Ref: DFS-260123-1500-d139. Retrieved 23 Jan 2026, 15:00 UTC
TOOL
GAS OPTIMISER
Minimise transaction costs across chains.
GO

Notice: This website provides informational analytics and data services only. We are not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). We do not offer, facilitate, or provide any financial services or products, including cryptocurrencies, digital assets, or derived products. Content on this site does not constitute financial advice.
DeFiStar.io is an independent data utility. We do not accept listing fees, we do not have an affiliate relationship with protocols, and we do not sell financial products. Our rankings are 100% algorithmic based on on-chain liquidity and smart contract data.
By accessing or using this website, you agree to be bound by our Terms of Service and acknowledge our Risk Disclosures.

Learn more: About Our Mission | Ranking Methodology |
DeFiStar.io, Clyde Offices, 2nd Floor, 48 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 1BP, Scotland, United Kingdom
© 2025–2026 defistar.io